AdYobe uses essential cookies to keep the site working. With your permission, optional cookies may also be used to improve your experience.
Read our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings: Were Nuclear Weapons Required to End the War?
Sorry, The owner of the requested video does not allow it to be played in embedded players.
The playback problem has been reported for administrator review. The video has not been disabled automatically.
Sorry,
We dont allow you to watch multiple videos at the same time.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings: Were Nuclear Weapons Required to End the War?
At 8.15 on 6th August 1945, USAA B29 bomber `Enola Gay’ dropped the world's first operational atomic bomb, nicknamed 'Little Boy'. Three days later, on 9th August, another B29 bomber dropped the second operational atomic bomb on the city of Nagasaki.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were experiments in a new kind of warfare, whose full implications were not entirely understood at the time. The bombing of these cities brought an end to the Second World War, but at a terrible cost to the Japanese civilian population, and signalling the dawn of the nuclear age. What had led to the fateful decision to deploy these new weapons of mass destruction?